<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Value in Meaningless Search Impressions? UPDATED</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/2008/09/03/value-in-meaningless-search-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/2008/09/03/value-in-meaningless-search-impressions/</link>
	<description>The New Imperative to Add Value to Customers&#039; Lives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:20:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks about Blimp</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/2008/09/03/value-in-meaningless-search-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks about Blimp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/?p=122#comment-79</guid>
		<description>[...] - bookmarked by 2 members originally found by jwf8 on 2008-12-26  Value in Meaningless Search Impressions?  http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/2008/09/03/value-in-meaningless-search-impressions/ - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; bookmarked by 2 members originally found by jwf8 on 2008-12-26  Value in Meaningless Search Impressions?  <a href="http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/2008/09/03/value-in-meaningless-search-impressions/" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/2008/09/03/value-in-meaningless-search-impressions/</a> &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raman</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/2008/09/03/value-in-meaningless-search-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>raman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/?p=122#comment-78</guid>
		<description>hmmmmm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmmmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meaningless search impressions? + Other Stuff that caught my eye recently&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/2008/09/03/value-in-meaningless-search-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Meaningless search impressions? + Other Stuff that caught my eye recently&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 23:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/?p=122#comment-77</guid>
		<description>[...] Search Impressions? In a recent post on the excellent marketingwitheaning* blog, Bob Gilbreath discusses recent search studies from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Search Impressions? In a recent post on the excellent marketingwitheaning* blog, Bob Gilbreath discusses recent search studies from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/2008/09/03/value-in-meaningless-search-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/?p=122#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Thanks for adding the inside color, Doohan!  As far as I know you&#039;re the first member of the study to actually share beyond a press release.

I&#039;m definitely taking a hard edge on purpose here, partly because it helps attract a discussion, but partly because I don&#039;t think reporters, agencies or clients are questioning enough.  I do wish they had shared their candidness with the rest of us on the issue of paid/organic synergy.

Now let&#039;s work on that &quot;moving cases&quot; study!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for adding the inside color, Doohan!  As far as I know you&#8217;re the first member of the study to actually share beyond a press release.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m definitely taking a hard edge on purpose here, partly because it helps attract a discussion, but partly because I don&#8217;t think reporters, agencies or clients are questioning enough.  I do wish they had shared their candidness with the rest of us on the issue of paid/organic synergy.</p>
<p>Now let&#8217;s work on that &#8220;moving cases&#8221; study!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doohan</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/2008/09/03/value-in-meaningless-search-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>doohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/?p=122#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Orville Redenbacher&#039;s was part of the study.  We went over results in detail with Google.  Agree with your points Bob but I didn&#039;t feel like we were getting BS&#039;d by GOOG in any way.  In fact, they were pretty candid about how paid and organic combined did not produce as much synergy as they expected.

I think paid and organic search is going to be proven very important for CPG.  GOOG and others represent the new shelf space and we need to defend our brands presence there.  As far as usefulness, I&#039;m thinking that having my brand there at the exact moment a consumer indicates relevant interest is pretty useful for both the consumer and my brand.  Jury is out on search&#039;s effect on moving cases for CPG but I have some ideas about how to prove that..... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orville Redenbacher&#8217;s was part of the study.  We went over results in detail with Google.  Agree with your points Bob but I didn&#8217;t feel like we were getting BS&#8217;d by GOOG in any way.  In fact, they were pretty candid about how paid and organic combined did not produce as much synergy as they expected.</p>
<p>I think paid and organic search is going to be proven very important for CPG.  GOOG and others represent the new shelf space and we need to defend our brands presence there.  As far as usefulness, I&#8217;m thinking that having my brand there at the exact moment a consumer indicates relevant interest is pretty useful for both the consumer and my brand.  Jury is out on search&#8217;s effect on moving cases for CPG but I have some ideas about how to prove that&#8230;.. <img src='http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

