<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lining Airport Security with Meaning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/2008/12/23/lining-airport-security-with-meaning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/2008/12/23/lining-airport-security-with-meaning/</link>
	<description>The New Imperative to Add Value to Customers&#039; Lives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:20:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/2008/12/23/lining-airport-security-with-meaning/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingwithmeaning.com/?p=219#comment-173</guid>
		<description>I believe the original conclusion is correct that the placement is brilliant (insert Guinness guys), but at the end of the day, it is still a push message that only brings forced limited interaction. Using the trays is still finding a new piece of real estate and covering it with a message. The interaction that takes place with the message is picking up the tray. Still a great idea.

What are your thoughts on Bono&#039;s Project (RED)? At first when I tried to apply Marketing with Meaning thoughts to it, I could not decide if this was the quintessential example of Marketing with Meaning, or not even close. It is NOT a charity, a cause or a theory according to the website www.joinred.com

Also, if you compare the Chex example to the Zappos example, there seems to be stark differences in both examples application. Could the differences be used to further define the concept?

Really enjoy the blog and the concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the original conclusion is correct that the placement is brilliant (insert Guinness guys), but at the end of the day, it is still a push message that only brings forced limited interaction. Using the trays is still finding a new piece of real estate and covering it with a message. The interaction that takes place with the message is picking up the tray. Still a great idea.</p>
<p>What are your thoughts on Bono&#8217;s Project (RED)? At first when I tried to apply Marketing with Meaning thoughts to it, I could not decide if this was the quintessential example of Marketing with Meaning, or not even close. It is NOT a charity, a cause or a theory according to the website <a href="http://www.joinred.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.joinred.com</a></p>
<p>Also, if you compare the Chex example to the Zappos example, there seems to be stark differences in both examples application. Could the differences be used to further define the concept?</p>
<p>Really enjoy the blog and the concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

