And so another personal venture into the new is complete. Following in the footsteps of services such as Second Life and Pointcast, I have now decided that Foursquare is no longer for me. It has gone down a personal “hype cycle” in my life–going from interesting to integral to ignoble in just a few months. Where once I was checking in with glee and sharing my whereabouts with new collections of friends, now I’m moving on with life and onto Facebook Places. My personal journey is one that others have also reported, and I think a look into why Foursquare worked for a while, and how others continue to be a part of my life, shows a path to meaningful platforms.
What I Loved About Foursquare
I got into Foursquare big-time back in March 2010 during the annual SXSW event. I attended with a small group of Bridge people and we had fun checking into new places and tracking each other’s locations around Austin. I was immediately attracted by the fact that you could walk into a restaurant and find a digital trace of other people who had been there in the months, days, or minutes before. The app allowed me to share my experience with Facebook friends and Twitter followers, and I was delighted by the chance to earn fun badges. And as a digital marketer I also saw firsthand the promise of location-based services.
Over time I tried to build Foursquare into my routine around town. I would meet people for a drink at a bar and excuse myself to check in, and I would dutifully add new locations to the service in order to “get credit” for my appearance. As a digital marketing consultant, I also began to speak glowingly of the possibilities of this new service
Where It Fell Apart
But soon the bloom came off the Foursquare rose for me. The first negative came in my attempt to work with the company on behalf of some of our very large clients. Phone calls went unanswered and scheduled phone calls ended with me sitting on the line waiting for their side to pick up. I quietly advised my teams and clients to wait until the company got its act together before we went further down this road. As a user, I also started doubting the value of this once-cool toy. I began to hear stories of people getting burglarized when they were not home, and my wife wondered why I was telling the world when I was out of town and she and my girls were alone. The “Honey, I need to understand what’s new in digital because it’s my job” excuse goes only so far, especially when there is no real utility in Foursquare at the end of the day.
And here we come to the real issue: There is no clear reason to install and use Foursquare. It is a toy that entertains for a few days or weeks, but at the end of the day there is no reason to make this a habit. Hardly any stores or restaurants pay attention to the service by, say, offering free offers with check-ins. The mayorships and badges seem silly after a while. And your friends tend to get tired of seeing where in the world you are.
Meanwhile, Facebook has come into location services with something that works much better. You can utilize your current friends list rather than starting from scratch with a new network, and check-ins can link directly to the Facebook pages of where you happen to be. Stores and restaurants can do marketing on their Facebook pages and offer information or special deals. Foursquare is still figuring out how to build a business and service users and marketers. But Facebook has this down already.
The Lesson: What New Apps Need to Succeed
In looking at a wide range of new digital services, I believe some patterns begin to develop. And the biggest one that I see right now, across everything from mobile apps to social media services, is that success comes in degrees based on whether the new company has the following:
- The Toy Factor — When people can download your app, try something new, and show their friends you have yourself a great “toy.” Foursquare is a toy. It has novelty, a link to the real world, and some games including the chance to earn badges. This is enough for people to download and play with for a few days or weeks, but it won’t last forever. The gang at Foursquare is still keynoting conferences and now has some investment dollars, but I believe the time has gone. The company should have built these next two factors into their initial design.
- A Valuable Tool–Once past the toy factor, your app needs some kind of useful service in order to succeed. Facebook, for example, started out for most of us as a clever toy that allowed us to play with self-expression. But many of us started using the service to communicate regularly with our friends. And because it was so useful, we built it into our daily habits and rituals. Foursquare could have created a simple way for retailers to communicate with the people checking into their businesses. Or it might have been launched with a focused purpose of helping people find money-saving offers on the places they visit. Now an app called Shopkick is showing it the way in this direction.
- Meaningful Marketing Model–Here’s where a lot of services have still not cracked the code, and where there is still tremendous opportunity for today’s start-ups. For marketer-supported services, you need a business model in which the advertising itself adds value to the service. Facebook is a great tool, but it still hasn’t shown that the little-seen ads on the right-hand side can drive marketers’ business. The best example of success here is Google and its AdWords service. The company started with a new search algorithm based on human link sharing. This was immediately a new “toy”–and because the results were so much more accurate, Google became a valuable tool. When the company created an advertising model based on search, everything came together; Google search ads are relevant to the searcher, and the marketer pays only when a desired action takes place–so there is a win-win-win that has created a +$20 billion business for Google.
I’m obviously simplifying the world of digital services and apps here, but I think this list helps to put a lot of things competing for our attention into their place.




Bob – totally had the same thing, I’ve officially retired from Foursquare. Although Australia has finally got its first FS promo via Coke, be interesting to see if it just digital marketing folk like me who enter…
I had these exact same thoughts last week when I did my very last check-in. Thanks to you, I don’t need to do the blog post…just point to yours.
I had many of these same thoughts right from the get-go. In a way, I really wanted to be wrong about it. I kept hoping that some advantage to location-based services was coming that I hadn’t yet realized.
I can see where Foursquare would be a great deal of fun during a convention, when you know there’s a concentration of people in one city with whom you have an affinity.
But the real deal breaker for me is the drawback your wife observed. I travel out of town once a month and I’m always careful to avoid mentioning it in any of my status updates until I’m safely home with my family.
Facebook Places hasn’t been too interesting yet since so few of my friends seem to be using it. But I think it has a lot more promise, particularly if it makes it easy to control who sees each of your geographic breadcrumbs.
You sound like a bit of a hypocrite…. Saying you moved onto Facebook places (which, like all other things facebook is also insecure without significant tweaking).
” I began to hear stories of people getting burglarized when they were not home, and my wife wondered why I was telling the world when I was out of town and she and my girls were alone.”.
The same thing can happen on Facebook.. But I challenge you to find the checkin status of a foursquare user who has properly set their security, same with Facebook….
Sure, there are some inherent security flaws with location based apps… But saying you’ve jumped ship from one to another and citing security as one of the reasons is…well… probably just because you needed another paragraph.
Thanks for the feedback, Brian. I appreciate you challenging my thinking.
I did not mean to suggest that Facebook is something I will immediately jump to because of the privacy issue. That said, for me, Facebook is already a carefully-crafted list of friends that has an increasing number of ways to control who sees what. Foursquare is an entirely new system with more limits. Follower requests come into my Foursquare app and it is difficult to see who they are based on very limited profile information. So people tend to friend few people, thus limited the benefit of the service, or they accept any request, which leads to security risks.
I don’t think I did, and certainly didn’t mean to, suggest that I’ve jumped on the Facebook Places bandwagon.
Bob
Bob, you’ve totally nailed my journey into and out of Foursquare, Gowalla, and the rest of the LBS apps. Where I was once an evangelist for what these services could do, I’m now at the other side of the hype station. And one key reason for this is what you talked about: their paltry attempt at providing business services. I too waited for their responses on behalf of clients who wanted to partner with them. Let’s be honest, that’s the ONLY way Foursquare and Gowalla can expect to succeed in the future: if there are enough business partnerships to make “checking in” worthwhile.
Perhaps there will be another upswing where I’ll reengage with LBS, but until there’s a stronger benefit to participating, I’ll be content with ignoring it.