Archive for the ‘Coverage’ Category

Another Vote for Marketing with Meaning

Tuesday, January 20th, 2009

Marketing with Meaning seems to be catching on in the early days of 2009. A little more than a week ago, the strategy team at Razorfish promoted the use of the word “meaning” to describe the act of brands acting to do something valuable with their marketing. This week I discovered Tim Leberecht’s blog iPlot, where he, too, is on the Marketing with Meaning bandwagon.

Tim is VP of Marketing and Communications at frog design in San Francisco. In what seems like a relatively new positioning, the firm states its purpose is to “help create and bring to market meaningful products, services, and experiences.” It’s a positioning that makes sense, as great design depends on digging deep into people’s needs, and then creating products that surprise and delight them. The firm works with clients ranging from HP to Victoria’s Secret.

Although frog shares only a handful of marketing-related examples, on January 1, Tim began posting about examples of companies that are pursuing Marketing with Meaning. He begins with a post about how business leaders should become Chief Meaning Officers. Later posts feature an anti-God campaign by pro-atheists in the UK (very gutsy post!), and a new cause marketing effort by Starbucks. Tim even works to lay out some structure for one way of organizing types of meaningful marketing.

I’m very glad to see another organization and individual promoting the idea of meaningful marketing, which adds another voice to the choir and increases the odds of the concept taking hold. However, I wish that Tim had at least acknowledged the work that we’ve been doing here for nearly a year. Even a cursory Google search of “marketing with meaning” would show that we’ve made nearly a hundred posts and have spawned a Twitter stream, plus LinkedIn and Facebook groups. Perhaps a trackback here will convince Tim to join the conversation we’ve started.

Either way, it’s good to have multiple viewpoints supporting a similar overall approach. I’ll keep watching his blog to see how another group makes the concept its own.

Marketing with Meaning—The Book Announcement

Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008

I am thrilled to announce that a few weeks ago, as I first reported on our Twitter feed, we signed a contract to publish a book focused on our Marketing with Meaning concept. This has been about a three-year production process already, and it will be almost a year from now that our book hits stores, but all good things take time. The process of securing a publisher itself has taken a while, and I believe readers (and a few prospective authors) might be interested to hear about the process.

After more than a year of gathering research, I felt it was time to try to write a book. I sat at my home office desk about a year ago and wrote about 170 pages of “a” book. It was going well, but I decided to step back and learn more about the process of non-fiction publication. Rule #1: Don’t write the book yet. I learned from several people that the right way to start is with a book proposal, a kind of business plan for the book that is used to summarize and sell it in to publishers.

I got a lot of really good advice—most from people who I had never met before. I started with fellow leaders at WPP who have been published. The great Jon Steel (Perfect Pitch and Truth, Lies & Advertising) offered excellent tips and contacts. Shane Atchison at ZAAZ (Actionable Web Analytics) encouraged me with his suggestions for making the writing process easier. Allen Adamson at Landor (BrandSimple and BrandDigital) wisely pushed me to get an agent. David Nicols (Brands & Gaming) was kind enough to chat even though he left the WPP nest. Jim Taylor (Space Race) offered a ton of insights into the publication and marketing process. I also learned a lot from someone I never actually spoke with—Timothy Ferriss (The 4-Hour Workweek) blogged about his experience in finding a publisher, and I probably re-read his post 100 times.

After absorbing this advice, I was lucky enough to run into an old marketing buddy, Pete Blackshaw, on the way to last year’s CES show in Vegas. He was finishing up his own book (Satisfied Customers Tell Three Friends, Angry Customers Tell 3,000) and recommended his agent, Lisa DiMona. Lisa and I hit it off immediately and we started working on a book proposal. Eventually we added Laureen Rowland to the team as an editor to help me perfect the proposal (and now the book). My big team at Bridge Worldwide also was always there for me to do everything from proofread the proposal to torture test my ideas to design a mock cover. Many more specific thanks will come in actual book form!

Eventually we had a strong proposal and Lisa did her agent magic, reaching out to the biggest marketing publishers in the world. I had a chance to personally “sell” to many of them. Everyone I spoke with agreed with the concept and felt its time was nigh. We ended up with offers from a few publishers and accepted one from McGraw-Hill. What I love about McGraw-Hill is that they are focused on the business market and especially the marketing specialty. I also like that they believe in taking books globally, and work to drive success for the long term.

Last week I paused for about three seconds amid a hectic day to just stare at the signed contract and appreciate the hard work by and help from so many people who made this book deal happen. Now the writing begins. I’ve actually spent the past several weekends and many evenings at work on the book, and most of my remaining vacation and holiday time in 2008 will go to this worthy cause. Luckily my wife and family are very understanding and encouraging. My day job won’t let up, though! Still gotta build the business and help our clients win.

Thank you, dear readers, for continuing to follow our progress and add to our story. The many blog readers and comments that I see each day provide the extra encouragement I need to keep pushing ahead. Stay tuned for more!

Twittering Away

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

As regular readers have probably noticed, I’ve been posting less frequently in the past couple of weeks. My goal is to have three entries per week, but I’ve dipped down to one to two lately. Don’t worry; I have not run short of content and I think this is a temporary situation driven by a burst of travel and new business work in my day job. But I do wish there were a way to keep the conversation going when these periodic time crunches happen.

Today I had an “aha” moment when Alex Rolfes, my right-hand man at Bridge Worldwide on this project, asked me if I would be interested in setting up a Twitter account for Marketing with Meaning. My first thought was, “Why?” For those who have not run across this yet, Twitter is a service that allows you to send and read short (140 characters) comments throughout the day. Think of it as “micro-blogging.” I have been watching Twitter from afar for some time. Working in a digital agency means we have to stay ahead on new media concepts like this. I have a few friends and clients who are Twittering, but I have not jumped in myself yet. I haven’t gotten in mainly because I don’t see the use for my life.

Some brands have gotten into the Twittering game with mixed results and commitment. Delta Airlines got some positive buzz when it suddenly started Twittering last year. Alas, their feed has been untouched since May 2007, lasting a whole 30 entries. I found their Twits interesting but random. On the other hand, some brands seem be using their Twitter feeds for focused, meaningful purposes. For example, Dell has a price deal alert; the BBC is using it for news alerts; and Barack Obama is using it to communicate where in the world he is campaigning every day. All of these examples offer valuable information within the benefits of the Twitter format.

Overall, my early take is that Twitter is a useful tool when a brand has something short, fast, and meaningful to say to its audience. For the Marketing with Meaning brand, our marketing objective is to drive awareness and adoption of our core concept. I think Twitter could help us do this. First, short, fast, meaningful observations and examples will help us share our message under my personal time constraints. Second, I believe that our audience (you) finds it meaningful to receive these short bursts of content on a frequent basis. We will judge the results over time based on the number of subscribers and comments received. At worst, we’ll learn together about this new medium….

I’m looking forward to the experiment and hope that you will join our feed!

Here’s our URL: https://twitter.com/mktgwithmeaning

Stream08 Recap

Monday, October 20th, 2008

A few weeks ago I had the chance to head back to Athens, Greece, for the second annual Stream Unconference, hosted by WPP Digital. I had a chance to discuss our Marketing with Meaning concept with a diverse group of client and agency leaders in the front lines of new marketing, and I came away with some great feedback and examples.

The overall concept of an unconference is outstanding. Usually business conferences are stuffy, boring, and full of people who paid extra to get a chance to speak about their new product or service. But this format was completely different. Instead of a strict agenda set by conference organizers, Stream had a big board with room/time slots that people selected to host any kind of discussion they wanted. You can see this in the photo above. This encourages people to take risks and invites a ton of valuable, democratic discussion.

Last year I shared our Marketing with Meaning concept at this event. It was really the first time that we had gotten public feedback on this point of view. This year I decided to present it again, since there were a lot of new people. But I also had some new wrinkles that I wanted to test out. Luckily, it went very well. My room was full at 9 a.m. and people were very interested and engaged. I learned a few things, such as when a person from Ogilvy let me know that Dove’s Evolution video had received 250 million views (and counting).  And I collected a handful of case studies that I will be featuring here and in our upcoming book.

Although I brought slides, the most valuable part of the session was the discussions it spawned. One of the new wrinkles I brought up was that meaningful marketing programs are less about mass scale and more about close connections with a smaller, more profitable base. People were surprised to hear, for example, that Nike+ only has 250,000 members who have run more than 100 miles. We also talked about the critical need to find clients who are willing to take the risk of moving from interruption to meaning. And because a lot of agency people were in the room, the conversation went to how we need to change our business models to adjust to these kinds of programs.

Everytime I present Marketing with Meaning I am encouraged to see faces light up and minds come alive.  People are getting it, and it’s getting them excited. On we go!

Marketing with Meaning Is (in) Contagious

Wednesday, October 1st, 2008

As I wrote in the first post of this blog, our goal as an agency is to help change the paradigm of marketing. One of the key measures of success is the level in which the marketing community is speaking, writing, and working against the model of Marketing with Meaning. I’m proud to say that we received more attention to this overall cause, and specifically to our interpretation of where it should go, through a special report from Contagious magazine titled “Branded Utility.”

A few months ago I was interviewed by Pippa Considine as part of her work in developing this special report. When we spoke, I found that Pippa had already conducted a great deal of research, and her perspective is closely linked to ours. We spent nearly an hour on the phone, sharing case studies and examples. The product of our discussion and many additional conversations is an outstanding piece of research and thinking. Her great work comes at a pretty steep price, though; you can purchase it for 450 British Pounds. For your investment consideration, here’s my take on the final product:

What I Loved

First, I’m thrilled that Pippa chose to include some specific examples that I shared with her. There is a nice paragraph on the ConAgra Foods Start Making Choices program. And she mentioned my story of David Ogilvy’s first ad, a guide to oysters for Guinness Stout. She included our belief that mobile marketing is skipping the interruptive stage and going straight to meaning. Pippa also addressed our view that the rise of digital is the catalyst for the rise of Meaningful Marketing:

What’s new at the beginning of the 21st century is the rapid change in digital technology, including the arrival of social networking sites and the increasing sophistication in the way that people use the Internet.”

Further, I enjoyed a section of the report that covered the growing connection between physical products and Web experiences. Nike+ is the obvious example, where running activity is uploaded to training tools. I had not heard about food brands such as Dole and MyFreshEgg that use codes to allow customers to track where a banana was picked or where a chicken laid an egg.

Finally, I was very impressed by an in-depth analysis of how brands are engaging with various partnerships to be able to deliver meaningful content. Again, Nike + iPod is the gold standard, but I also learned about the example of Google partnering with BMW to allow people to program their car navigation systems through Google Maps on their computers.

Opportunity Areas

I’m biased, of course, but I am not happy with the choice of “Branded Utility” to represent this shift in the marketplace. First, “utility” suggests only tools and widgets rather than a wide variety of value-added marketing approaches. Second, the word is straight out of economics textbooks, and lacks the very soul that we want our marketing to assume. People don’t use “utility” to describe how something special touches their lives. So I’ll still take “meaning,” which speaks to higher-level personal experiences.

What’s missing from this report is a true model that marketers can use to shift their organizations. While there are many outstanding examples here and a few dos and don’ts, the report is missing a model or structural framework that can help brands figure out the right way to add value to their specific customers around their specific equities. There are also missing pieces around measurement, long-term investments, and how to sell such programs internally.

What’s Next

In a matter of days I will be able to share some great news on our publication of a book around the concept of Marketing with Meaning. This blog will continue to provide ongoing tips, suggestions, and content, but our book will pull together a holistic model of this new approach. I know from personal experience on both the client and agency side that such a dramatic shift in approach needs more than a cool keynote or a clever case study. It will be more “how-to” guide than “should-do” manifesto.  Stay tuned!

Initial Launch Reactions

Monday, June 2nd, 2008

Only a week ago Advertising Age wrote about our new Marketing with Meaning concept. This story represented our launch of Marketing with Meaning outside of our office walls, and we’re getting some very good feedback and responses.

Many friends – and even competitors – in the advertising industry have called or emailed to offer congratulations, as well as praise the thinking behind Marketing with Meaning. I was asked to appear on the SustainCommWorld conference on “making media green and profitable.” I received an email and blog link from two separate agency CEOs: Robert Wheatley of Wheatley & Timmons PR agency praised the concept and linked to his own similar perspective; and Drew Neisser of Renegade linked in with his agency’s take, Marketing as Service. I received another nice email and blog post link from Anne Stewart, who runs HotCards.com.

I also thought it was interesting that the concept seems to be catching hold within the staff at Ad Age. Another reporter called me last week to talk more about branded tools; and Rupal Parekh at the tongue-in-cheek Adages blog says, “You want marketing with meaning?… take a Japanese bra that uses solar panels to recharge gadgets.”

Of course not every piece of feedback was positive. One of our first links was from Steve Lambert at the Anti-Advertising Agency. As you can probably guess, this is an organization that doesn’t like what we do for a living. We had a good back-and-forth on his blog, and it proved to me that responding to critics is often the best way to go. Another anti-advertising group put us on its “Spin of the Day” list.

So as we start Week 2 of the Marketing with Meaning revolution, my team and I are feeling pretty good. I will continue to share links and feedback (both good and bad) in this space.

Welcome, Ad Age Readers

Tuesday, May 27th, 2008

Today we were pleasantly surprised to return from the long weekend to see a great piece from Advertising Age about our Marketing with Meaning concept. What a great way to start the week!

The purpose of this blog is to start a discussion about where we believe the future of digital – and the future of marketing overall – needs to go. Although we’ve been working on this concept for nearly two years, our blog is barely a week old. Going forward, we will post examples of meaningful and not-so-meaningful marketing, as well as share the progress of this overall idea. We invite you to subscribe, comment, and submit your own examples and stories.

Thanks for visiting, and we look forward to sharing the cause with you.