Posts Tagged ‘toyota’

Saved by Hyundai

Tuesday, January 13th, 2009

A few weeks ago I wrote one of our most visited posts about the lameness of Toyota’s “Saved by Zero” television advertising campaign. Unless you’ve been hiding under a rock for the past three months, you’ve got to recall Toyota’s annoying use of The Fixx’s song and the promise of 0% interest rates. Some of you might have even joined the Facebook protest of this campaign, which now, thankfully, seems off the air.  According to Toyota’s spokesperson, the purpose of the campaign was to remind people that loans were still to be had (at great rates) in these troubled economic times.

But today one of our Search gurus, Ian “Trey” Dahlman, pinged me to let me know that Hyundai was doing something remarkably different. It seems the brand has launched the “Hyundai Assurance Guarantee.” The straightforward program promises to let people return their cars if they lose their jobs. That’s right, “if you cannot make a payment because of a covered life-changing event, we’ll allow you to return your vehicle and walk away from your loan obligation-and in most cases we will cover most, if not all of the difference.”

It’s a pretty dramatic offer, which is very meaningful coming at a time of dramatic economic risk. Hyundai realizes the main dynamic in the auto industry today-that people are holding off on making purchases because they are afraid of what will happen next. The reality is that a lot of these people do need new wheels, and most will retain employment. Hyundai’s downside is relatively small, while the upside is a strong differentiation in the marketplace and the chance to close some sales.

Hyundai’s killer idea obviously comes from honing in on understanding the needs of its target customer, and figuring out what its marketing could do to address the issue. And in this case, it didn’t take months of focus groups or $300,000 omnibus studies-but rather some old-fashioned common sense and human understanding.

Early proof of the meaning and effectiveness of this promotion is seen in the (free) news coverage it has already spawned. A quick Google news search shows several stories from media both small and large.  This free advertising means that Hyundai’s campaign will be even more successful. The only news coverage of Toyota’s “Saved by Zero” campaign was that of its annoyance factor.

According to Hyundai, the campaign is already driving positive business results. The company says it has gotten hundreds of phone calls to inquire about the offer, and showroom traffic is up considerably.

Long-term, Hyundai could reap some great brand equity builds out of a campaign like this-first, with buyers who feel that the company is looking out for them. Even those not in the market who are simply exposed to the message likely forge a more positive opinion of the brand.

I’ll keep an eye on the brand’s progress and track results over time. This should be an interesting case to watch!

UPDATE: Jonah Bloom, Advertising Age Editor has a nice article on the program, which ended up featuring it in a SuperBowl spot on February 1.

UPDATE 2: Here’s an article about other companies in other categories that are similarly aiding people who are out of work.  And, through March, not a single car buyer has returned a car!

Death By Zero

Monday, December 1st, 2008

This week I discovered one of the best uses of Facebook for a marketing cause. Well, it’s more of an anti-marketing cause, I suppose. It’s a group called Stop Playing Toyota’s “Saved By Zero” Commercial, and it is the center of an interesting battle in the front lines of new marketing.

I haven’t found anyone who doesn’t recognize this commercial, but just in case you have effectively skipped all TV ad pods in the past three months, this story is about how Toyota is running a TV ad to promote a no-interest offer on select vehicles. In order to effectively pry this message into our brains, Toyota has licensed the new wave classic “Saved By Zero” by the Fixx, and is airing the ad ceaselessly (see here if you must). The ads are running especially during live NFL and NCAA football games, which is the last refuge of non-ad-skipped media in many of our households.

This week Advertising Age put the spotlight on this TV commercial, along with a handful of others that seem to have passed the point of frequency nausea. Other examples include DirecTV’s play on the classic movie Vacation with Christie Brinkley, and Denis Leary as the new voice of Ford trucks. There was some interesting information that suggests we are at some kind of tipping point:

  • Repeating ads suggest that fewer companies are investing in TV commercial production and media buys.
  • These repeating ads might further spur consumers to purchase DVRs, already in place in 26% of households, or be the impetus for existing DVR owners to finally adopt the ad-skipping habit.
  • Because audiences are so fragmented, the same ad must be shown more often to achieve Reach goals.
  • Falling ratings mean that networks have to air even more ads for free—a term called “make goods.”
  • Consumers have grown much more sensitive to commercial repeat and are reaching the point of negative returns, called “wear out,” more rapidly. Wear out now happens after eight showings today, versus after 15 to 20 showings only 10 years ago (per Kate Sirkin, Exec VP at Starcom MediaVest).

It is interesting to analyze the comments by Wade Hoyt, a Toyota representative, when questioned as part of the Advertising Age article. He admits that the company “saturated the airwaves” purposely, because “there were all these media reports that credit was not available, and we felt it was keeping some shoppers away from dealers, so we wanted to have a dramatic program that reinforced the fact that we still had credit available.” So, in a way, I guess you could say Toyota was doing us a public service… Marketing with Meaning, eh?

But what about the collateral damage from this deliberate carpet bombing of our living rooms? I wonder if Toyota is calculating the number of people who now have a (growing) negative impression of its brand. I suppose a relative handful of people who were worried about credit availability might now go to a dealership. But I’d wager that a vast majority of us begin to form a negative perception of the Toyota brand, which grows with each repetition of “Saavvveed byyy zeerrrooo.” Toyota is not only effectively spamming us endlessly, but it is hammering home a promotional message that makes the brand seem just like all of the other desperate car companies in the market. It’s a page right out of the Big 3 owner’s manual.

And it doesn’t take much for consumers to band together to vent their frustration and protest the brand’s actions. The Facebook protest group above has more than 9,000 members and growing. Interestingly, it took far less than this number of Motrin Moms to cause J&J to pull down the brand’s website because of a Twitter backlash. How many more Facebook protesters or YouTube parodies until Toyota pays attention?

There have been annoying ads in the past, many with more airtime than Toyota’s. But today’s empowered consumer has a shorter fuse and more powerful voice, and in these “challenging times,” they hold more purchase power than ever.